🎧 Audio
📖 Script
In a significant legal development, a UK court has allowed Palestine Action, a pro-Palestinian group, to proceed with a full legal challenge against an “antiterrorism” ban. This decision was made by the High Court in London, which means that the group can now argue their case in court. The group believes that the ban unfairly targets their peaceful protest activities, which aim to raise awareness about the situation in Palestine.
Palestine Action is known for its active protests, often involving sit-ins and other forms of civil disobedience. The group argues that these activities are non-violent and are meant to draw attention to the policies and actions of companies they believe are complicit in the ongoing situation in Palestine. According to the group, the ban imposed by the authorities is an infringement on their right to protest and express their views.
The High Court’s decision is seen as a victory for freedom of speech and the right to protest. Many human rights organizations have expressed support for Palestine Action, stating that the ability to challenge such bans is crucial for maintaining democratic freedoms. The court’s ruling allows Palestine Action to present evidence and arguments against the ban, which they hope will lead to its removal.
The case has broader implications for other activist groups in the UK. If Palestine Action successfully overturns the ban, it could set a precedent that strengthens the rights of groups to protest without being labeled as engaging in terrorism-related activities. This is particularly important at a time when many groups feel that their rights to protest are being increasingly restricted.
The outcome of this legal challenge will be closely watched by both domestic and international observers. It highlights the ongoing tension between security measures and civil liberties, a balance that many countries struggle to maintain. As the case progresses, it will raise important questions about how societies can protect both national security and individual freedoms.
📝 Vocabulary
- legal: relating to the law
例文: “They sought legal advice before proceeding.”
Collocations／日本語の意味を見る
- legal rights
- legal system
- legal status
法律の - ban: an official prohibition or restriction
例文: “The city imposed a ban on smoking in public places.”
Collocations／日本語の意味を見る
- impose a ban
- lift a ban
- ban on
禁止 - protest: a statement or action expressing disapproval of or objection to something
例文: “The workers organized a protest against the new policy.”
Collocations／日本語の意味を見る
- peaceful protest
- protest march
- organized protest
抗議 - infringement: a violation or breach of a law or agreement
例文: “They sued the company for patent infringement.”
Collocations／日本語の意味を見る
- copyright infringement
- infringement of rights
- patent infringement
侵害 - precedent: an earlier event or action regarded as an example or guide
例文: “The case set a precedent for future legal decisions.”
Collocations／日本語の意味を見る
- set a precedent
- legal precedent
- precedent for
前例
✏️ Grammar Point
Relative Clauses – “This decision was made by the High Court in London, which means that the group can now argue their case in court.”
文法の日本語補足を見る
💡 使用場面
(会話での使いどころ: 詳細情報を追加して説明を豊かにする際に使われます)
📝 使用例文
“例: In a business meeting, you might say: ‘If we cut costs now, we can increase our profit margin next quarter.’”
❓ Listening Questions
- True/False: The UK court has allowed Palestine Action to challenge an “antiterrorism” ban.
- MCQ: What type of activities is Palestine Action known for?
a) Violent protests
b) Civil disobedience
c) Political campaigns
d) Educational workshops - MCQ: What might happen if Palestine Action successfully overturns the ban?
a) Strengthen the government’s power
b) Lead to more bans on protests
c) Set a precedent for protest rights
d) Reduce international support
🔑 Listening Answersを見る
- True
- b) Civil disobedience
- c) Set a precedent for protest rights
📚 Reading Questions
- What is the main legal issue that Palestine Action is challenging in the UK court?
- Why do human rights organizations support Palestine Action’s legal challenge?
- What does the word “precedent” mean in the context of this article?
🔑 Reading Answersを見る
🇯🇵 日本語での経済ニュース解説
英国の裁判所が「反テロ」禁止令に対するパレスチナ支援グループの法的挑戦を認めたことは、表現の自由と抗議する権利に関わる重要な問題です。このケースは、国内外の他の活動家グループにも影響を及ぼす可能性があり、成功すれば、抗議活動がテロ活動とラベル付けされることなく行われる権利を強化する前例となるかもしれません。このような法的闘争は、国家の安全保障と個人の自由のバランスをどのように保つかという、国際的に議論される課題に光を当てています。今後の展開が注目されます。
